Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Is <dax:reissuedate> broken?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Posts
    157

    Default Is <dax:reissuedate> broken?

    I added <dax:reissuedate> to a template I'm writing. I entered (as a test) 1/1/2001 and the tag emits 1695580160 instead. The tag value changes to different long numbers as I changed the date. I suspect I'm seeing the internal representation of the date, instead of a formatted representation.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,549

    Default Re: Is <dax:reissuedate> broken?

    Quote Originally Posted by Balok
    I added <dax:reissuedate> to a template I'm writing. I entered (as a test) 1/1/2001 and the tag emits 1695580160 instead. The tag value changes to different long numbers as I changed the date. I suspect I'm seeing the internal representation of the date, instead of a formatted representation.
    I think you're right, it does not output correct date in some cases. I will fix it in next build (6.1.4). Thanks for reporting the issue.

    Andrei

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: Is <dax:reissuedate> broken?

    Thanks for fixing this!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •